Posts Tagged ‘Books’

5
May

Richard III as the Founder of Collegiate Churches

   Posted by: Dorothea Preis    in Medieval Miscellany

Richard as the Founder of Collegiate Churches

Where we today can come closest to Richard and his patronage of learning is through the centres of learning, which he supported.  There are the two universities, Oxford and Cambridge, but we must not forget the collegiate churches he founded.

The late middle ages saw the foundation of numerous chantries and collegiate churches to provide prayers for the dead.  A chantry was an altar endowed for one or more priests to say Mass for its founder and possibly other patrons.  The size of chantries ranged from a side altar in an existing parish church to separate chapels.

A collegiate church or college was a corporation of secular priests set up for the same purpose as chantries.  Sometimes they were not part of a parish, but most often they were added to an existing parish church.

It was not unusual to have almshouses or schools attached to chantries and colleges [Keen, p.273; Melhuish, p.1].  While Richard followed the fashion for college foundations enthusiastically – in total he was responsible for 10 chantry or collegiate foundations [Ross, p.130] – there is no evidence that schools (or almshouses for that matter) were to be included in the colleges he set up, but this does not necessarily mean that no education took place.  As with all these foundations “Divine service and the ability to sing God’s praise came first, education second, but they were closely interrelated.” [Sutton & Visser Fuchs, ‘Cambridge’, p. 106]  It also needs to be remembered that choristers would need a teacher of grammar and music, who could very well teach other boys as well. [Sutton & Visser Fuchs, ‘Cambridge’, p.120]

1. The College at Middleham

Richard III as the Founder of Collegiate Churches

St Mary and Alkelda, Middleham (© D Preis)

In 1477 Richard began to establish two colleges, one at Middleham and one at Barnard Castle, for both of them he procured royal licences on 21 February 1478. [Ross, p.130].

The origins of the parish church of St Mary and St Alkelda in Middleham might date back to Saxon times, but its elevation to college status was Richard’s work.  The college was to consist of a dean, 6 chaplains, 4 clerks, 6 choristers and a sacristan.  One of the clerks was charged with offering perpetual masses for the good of Richard’s living family and the souls of all the faithful departed [Melhuish, pp.1-2].

The statutes for the college are in English, and probably reflect the most detailed indication of Richard’s personal religious taste.  The dean had to have his continual residence at Middleham and it is emphasised that he had to have sufficient learning.  [Dobson, p.141]

Over time Richard settled property on the college, though his last settlement, made shortly before Bosworth, by which he wanted to make the college more financially secure, was not enacted by Henry Tudor. [Melhuish, pp.6-10]

The first dean was William Beverley, who probably came from York and was a Cambridge graduate.   He had been the rector of Middleham before Richard set up the college and then became its first dean.  Richard must have liked him a lot.  When he became king, Beverley’s career took off dramatically.  He was promoted to dean of the king’s chapel of St Stephen’s, Westminster, and dean of St George’s, Windsor, and was granted many other benefices, among them that of dean to the collegiate church of Wimborne in Dorset.  He was also made precentor at York Minster.  Previously this had not been a valuable benefice, but this was changed when Beverley came, which might have been just as well, as he kept this position after Bosworth.  Towards the end of 1493 he contracted the sweating sickness and died.  He requested to be buried either at York Minster or the church at Middleham. [Sutton & Visser-Fuchs, ‘Cambridge’, pp.124-125; Dobson, pp.142-144]

While many of these collegiate foundations became victims of the reformation, the King’s College of Middleham was one of the few exempted from suppression [Melhuish, p.8] and continued as a college until 1845, when a special Act of Parliament had to be passed to abolish it.  Nor is Richard forgotten:  he and his family have a memorial window in the South Aisle and his pennant is flown from the tower on significant dates [‘Middleham Collegiate Church’].

2. The College at Barnard Castle

Richard III as the Founder of Collegiate Churches

St Mary’s, Barnard Castle (© Copyright David Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence)

Compared to Middleham, nothing much is known about the college at Barnard Castle, but it has to be assumed that it was planned along similar lines, though on a far grander scale with twelve priests, ten clerks and six choristers.  This would have made it “the most ambitious late medieval chantry establishment in the palatinate of Durham”. [Dobson, p.141]  However, as the only existing document is the licence, it seems likely that it never came into being.  [Ross, pp.130-131; BHO ‘Barnard Castle’]  Nevertheless, Richard carried out extensive alterations to the church of St Mary’s from 1477 until his death in 1485.  If you visit the church today you can come face to face with Richard:  The chancel arch is decorated with Yorkist roses and two portrait heads, believed to be those of Edward IV and Richard.  Outside the church Richard’s badge, the Boar Passant, is carved in the exterior of the East window of the South Transept.  The church’s website remembers him as their “great benefactor”, [‘St Mary’s Barnard Castle’] and a newspaper article said:  “Fate smiled on St Mary’s in Barnard Castle when Richard III came to power”.  [‘Church on mission to revamp building’].

3. The College at York Minster

Richard III as the Founder of Collegiate Churches

York Minster (© D Preis)

As king, Richard planned an even larger college with 100 priests as an extension to St William’s College at York Minster, which had been founded by George and Richard Neville.   Contemporary information on this project rather limited.  At the time of Richard’s death, six new altars had been constructed within in the minster for the king’s chaplains and the building of their collegiate house had been started and he had given the Minster money, precious relics as well as a magnificent jewelled altar cross.  It is not known whether any of the priests had actually arrived, nor do we know what their exact responsibilities would have been apart from celebrating mass for Richard and his family.  [Dobson, pp.144-146; Ross, pp.130 +132; Sutton, ‘Piety’, pp.85+88, Melhuish, p.14]  Because of his grand plans for the York Minster, it has been suggested that this is where his son Edward is buried.  Richard and – probably – Anne visited York unofficially for three days in the beginning of May 1484, which might have been for their son’s burial. [Hammond, p.31]  It is even possible that he might have planned this chantry to serve as the tomb for himself and his family [Dobson,pp.146-147] with the priests looking after the family’s spriritual needs in this world and the next.

4. The College at St. Mary, Allhallows

Richard III as the Founder of Collegiate Churches

All Hallows by the Tower (© Copyright John Salmon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence)

The three previous colleges were all in the North, but Richard also “founded another in the church of St. Mary of Barking, by the Tower of London” [John Rous, History of the Kings of England; quoted in Potter, p.88].  St Mary was a chapel in the churchyard of Allhallows near the Tower of London, which had been founded by Richard I (the’ Lionheart’).

In 1465 Edward IV had had founded a chantry there with two chaplains, who were to pray for the king and his family including brothers and parents.  The chapel was governed by a fraternity, whose warden was John Tiptoft, earl of Worcester, another man of great learning and an early importer of printed books. [Armstrong, p.269]

Richard then wanted to erect a deanery and give it the status of a royal free chapel.  He persuaded Barking nunnery in Essex, to whom the mother church Allhallows belonged, to give up the mother church to the chapel in exchange for a pension.  Like Middleham, it was planned as a college with a dean and six cannons.  Edmund Chaderton was appointed first dean.   He had been treasurer of George Neville and became Richard’s treasurer of the chamber.  He was a trusted administrator and had taken “personal charge of most of Buckingham’s forfeited lands as receiver and surveyor”. [Wolffe, p.10; Ross, p.176]  The canons were to be all university graduates and hold M.A. degrees.  Stow writes about Richard’s “new built“ chapel, but it is doubtful how much building work was actually carried out during the short time.  The chapel only received its status as a free chapel in March 1485.  As soon as Henry VII came to power the Abbess of Barking Nunnery petitioned for the return of the church and regained it.  The chapel was destroyed in 1548 and the area was initially used as a garden plot and later a store house was built there. [BHO ‘All Hallows Church’; Horrox; Stow, p.50]

Part 1 – Richard III and Learned Men

Part 3 – Richard III and the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge

Part 4 – Richard III as Law Maker (incl. bibliography)

Tags: , , , , ,

2
May

Richard III and Learned Men

   Posted by: Dorothea Preis    in Medieval Miscellany

‘Richard III and Learned Men’ is the first part of a talk presented to the NSW branch of the Richard III Society at the general meeting on 21 April 2012.  For reasons of space it will be published in four parts.  An extensive bibliography is to follow with Part IV.

Richard III and Learned Men

University Class in the 1350s

I particularly liked this picture of a university lecture in the 1350s because of the student having a nap in the front of the picture and others hat the back having a chat – nothing much has changed in the last 700 years.

Last year I drew the letter “E” for one of our branch’s Scrabble talks (you have to prepare a short talk on a Ricardian/late medieval subject beginning with that letter) and looked at ‘Richard III and Education’.  There were certain limitations, I had to have a topic starting with the letter “E” and my time was limited, and the word “education” brought for me the association with little kids learning their ABC.  Therefore I decided to extend it to talk about ‘Richard III and Learning’ in a wider context.

The strongest indication for Richard’s interest in learning we have is his religious activity.  In his day it was not possible to separate learning and religion; the centres of learning, the universities, were basically religious institutions.  During his life he showed a marked support for religious institutions and liked to surround himself with learned men.  Ross says that “there is no good reason to doubt that Richard was a genuinely pious and religious man” [Ross, p.128], but I believe that to see this purely in a religious context is too limited.  My contention is rather that Richard was interested in and actively supported learning, which for him went hand in hand with his faith.

In the following I want to demonstrate this in three areas:  Richard and his connection to a selection of learned men, his connection to the centres of learning and his actions as a law maker.

Richard III and Learned Men

Richard III and Learned Men

Bust of a bishop on a corner of Magdalen College, Oxford (© Dorothea Preis)

Richard realised that learned men would provide competent counsellors and administrators, and took full taken advantage of this.  As Sutton and Visser-Fuchs say, “The list of … learned men in his employment is a long one”. [Sutton & Visser-Fuchs, Hours, p.80]  Ross remarks on his love to surround himself with graduate scholars and likens him to Henry V, rather than Edward IV.  He sees the praise for him of the Canterbury Convocation of 1484 as the result of his protection of the church and his patronage of learning.  [Ross, p.132] In addition, it can be said that “he may have himself possessed a little more learning that most men of his background”. [Sutton & Visser-Fuchs, ‘Cambridge’, p.119]

The fashion for learning was not new in Richard’s day, it is rather the continuation of a trend which started in the first half of the 15th century with men like William Bingham, and – even earlier – William Wykeham, bishop of Winchester.  Though neither of them had been particularly well educated themselves, they both were alarmed at the lack of educated clergy and teachers and set out to do something about it. [ODNB ‘Bingham’; ODNB ‘Wykeham’]

It has been said that Richard favoured graduates from Cambridge rather than from Oxford [e.g. Ross, p. 132], but the case is not as clear cut as it might seem.  While there was a certain amount of Cambridge graduates among the men near Richard, there were also quite a number of men from Oxford.  In addition, many of learned men in Richard’s service had connections with both universities as well as foreign ones.  [Sutton & Visser-Fuchs, ‘Cambridge’, p.118]

An early direct influence on Richard was probably George Neville, Archbishop of York, who was a well-educated patron of learning and a great benefactor of Oxford University, where he had studied at Balliol College.  He is also regarded as a supporter of the revival of Greek studies.  Several of his associates would later prosper through their association with Richard, for instance John Shirwood, Thomas Langton, Thomas Barowe (though I question his association with Neville) and  Edmund Chaderton. [Sutton, ‘Piety’, pp.87-88; ODNB ‘Neville’]

I would like to introduce six men, who were at their time known for their high degree of learning and also had a more or less close association to Richard.
Richard’s choice for the two bishops he appointed while king is telling:  Thomas Langton of Salisbury and John Shirwood of Durham, both had more or less direct associations with George Neville – and both were known for their learning.  [Sutton & Visser-Fuchs, Hours, p.80]

1. Thomas Langton (c.1430–1501)

Thomas Langton was the brother of a long standing associate of George Neville.  Edward IV seems to have been impressed by him and helped him in his early career.  He also used him in diplomatic missions, a pattern that continued under Richard III.  Richard must have liked him a lot, because he did not suggest him for a bishopric only once but twice:  when in May 1483 the then bishop of St David’s died, Richard as protector suggested Langton for the post; and in early 1485 he secured  his translation to Salisbury.  While he certainly was useful to Richard as a diplomat, it was specifically his learning, which earned him his elevation. [ODNB ‘Langton’; Sutton, ‘Piety’, p.88; Ross, p.133]

Langton accompanied Richard on his progress in August 1483, during which he made his famous remark:

He contents the people where he goes best that ever did prince; …  God hath sent him to us for the weal of us all.  [quoted in Potter, p.127]

2. John Shirwood (d.1493)

John Shirwood came from a family of keen Yorkists.  He was another associate of George Neville, and both he and Richard as duke of Gloucester worked for Neville’s release when he was imprisoned after Barnet.  Shirwood was famous for being one of the earliest English humanists. He had a rare knowledge of Greek and wrote in polished Latin. He had an extensive library containing more than three dozen, mainly printed, works.  He wrote his name in them, usually on the last page, together with the date and place where he had bought them, giving us an idea where he was when.  Richard was personally interested in the County Palatinate of Durham.  And as his books show, Shirwood, who had been in Rome off and on since 1477, spent virtually the whole time of Richard’s reign in Rome, which led some commentators to the conclusion that his absence might have been an added point in favour of his selection.  However, he was in England for Richard’s coronation, and must have impressed Richard on this occasion.  In addition to the bishopric, Richard also recommended him for a cardinal’s hat, so he must have thought quite highly of him.  [ODNB, ‘Shirwood’; Allen; Williams]

3. John Gunthorpe (d.1498)

Another renowned scholar and humanist with close relations to Richard was John Gunthorpe, dean of Wells.  While protector, Richard made him keeper of the privy seal on 10 May 1483, an office he retained throughout Richard’s reign.  Richard also used him on diplomatic missions as he was an eminent Latin and, like Shirwood, Greek scholar. [Ross, pp.133-134; ODNB ‘Gunthorpe’]

4. John Russell (c.1430–1494)

Richard’s choice for his chancellor fell on John Russell, bishop of Lincoln. Russell had studied civil and canon law at Oxford, while both Langton and Shirwood had degrees in theology.  On the one hand Russell was a career civil servant – he had been counsellor of Edward IV – making him a likely choice, but he was also an eminent scholar.  Thomas More was later to describe him as “one of the best learned men undoubtedly that England had in his time.” [quoted in Ross, pp.132-133]  He is known as one of the first to buy printed books on the continent and bringing them into England in 1466. [Armstrong, p.268-269; Masek, p.7]

5. John Doget (d.1501)

All four men chosen by Richard for public office confirm what Ross sees as “an increasing awareness of the importance of humanistic scholarship as a qualification for high office in the clerical establishment of government”.  [Ross, p.134]  However, even with his more private appointments, Richard showed that he valued learning in the men he surrounded himself with.  He selected John Doget as his private chaplain in 1483.  Doget was another noted scholar and author among other things on a documentary on Plato’s Phaedo. [Ross, p.134]

Richard was not alone in striving for a “better education of the clergy and the improvement of services in their localities” [Sutton & Visser-Fuchs, Hours, p.80], nor was he by any means the first.   After the challenge of Lollardy many people saw the need for better educated priests.  It is in this context that we have to see Henry VI’s interest in Eton College as well as university colleges.  It was Henry who had promoted William Waynflete. [Bennett, pp.84-85]

6. William Waynflete (c.1400–1486)

Richard III and Learned Men

Statue of William Waynflete on the gate of Magdalen College, Oxford (© Dorothea Preis)

The first five men all benefited largely from Richard’s patronage.  However, he also had contact with one, whose career started long before Richard.

William Waynflete was an interesting character, whose “concern with the teaching of grammar … were to dominate his career” [Davis, p.3].  From a gentry background, Waynflete had been  a schoolmaster at Winchester College for 11 years, when he came to the attention of Henry VI, who “head hunted” him for the position of provost of his newly established Eton College.   His association with Henry helped his career tremendously and he became Bishop of Winchester in spring 1447, a position he fulfilled conscientiously. [Davis, pp.13-15]

He also served as Chancellor of England during the difficult time from 1456 to 1460.   As chancellor his main aim seems to have been to establish peaceful relations between both sides, but I think it is correct to say that “Political activities were not Waynflete’s principal concern” [ODNB ‘Waynflete’].

His main motive was the promotion of education and for this purpose he founded St Mary Magdalen College in Oxford on 12 June 1458. [Gardiner]  His college is seen – after William Bingham’s Godshouse in Cambridge – as the second secondary school training-college. [Lloyd, p. 38] He gave valuable gifts of books to the library of his college.  The emphasis was on the college’s responsibility to teaching. [Gardiner].

Part 2 – Richard III as the Founder of Collegiate Churches

Part 3 – Richard III and the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge

Part 4 – Richard III as Law Maker (incl. bibliography)

Tags: , , , , ,

17
Mar

Me Fieri Fecit

   Posted by: Dorothea Preis    in News

This is the title of an upcoming symposium at the University of Kent on ‘the role and representation of owners, donors and patrons in medieval art’.

The programme sounds most interesting.  There is a talk ‘“Mon seul desir”: Self-presentation in the patronage of John Talbot, 1st Earl of Shrewsbury’, who was the father of Eleanor Talbot, who is so instrumental in Richard III’s claim to the throne.  And another one on ‘The Changing Image of Plantagenet Kingship: Hagiography and political iconography in the owner figures of St Stephen’s Chapel’.

Once again we probably feel disappointed that we can’t simply go and attend an interesting event like this.  However, in this case we have something to make up for it:  The NSW Branch one day convention on the following Sunday in Mittagong!  An event not to be missed.

For more info on the symposium, click here.

Tags: , ,

25
Jan

Loyalty Binds Me – for free

   Posted by: Joan Szechtman    in Bookworm

For a limited time, Loyalty Binds Me, my second book about Richard III in the 21st-century, is available for free from Amazon, Apple iTunes, Barnes & Nobel , and on Smashwords in all formats.

Although it’s the second book in the series, it was written to be enjoyed as a stand-alone novel.

Free (normally $2.99)/Recommended by Midwest Book Reviews and a review on this site.

Should the price on Smashwords not appear as “Free”, readers who will be getting the download from Smashwords, please contact me (on: u2nohoo”AT”gmail.com) and I’ll send you a coupon for 100% off the SW price.

P.S. My first book This Time was nominated General Fiction Finalist of 2010 Next Generation Indie Book Awards

Tags: ,

16
Jan

Loyalty Binds Me

   Posted by: Dorothea Preis    in Bookworm

Book Review:  Loyalty Binds Me

JLoyalty Binds Meoan Szechtman, Loyalty Binds Me.  Star Publish, 2011.  ISBN 978-1935188254 (also available for Kindle and other ebook readers)

Loyalty Binds Me is a worthy sequel to Richard III in This Time by Joan Szechtman.  Richard visits the UK with his modern day family to pay his respects at the grave of his first wife, Anne Neville.  Basically as soon as he arrives he gets arrested for the murder of his nephews.  However, it soon turns out that this is just a smokescreen to get hold of him and that there is more to the case than meets the eye.

It is a fast-paced story and Richard as well as the reader can never be sure who his supporters are, but in the end we realise who is bound by loyalty.  Loyalty is – as the title indicates – an important theme in this novel.  Given the nature of the official accusations against him, we learn what Richard might have to say on the matter of the fate of the princes.

The views of some of the novel’s characters certainly resonate with Ricardians:

“What did I tell you, Flower,” Simon said, “ever since Henry VII won, the law’s gone to hell. Our Richard wouldn’t have allowed people to be held without charge.

Well-written and fun to read. I look forward to reading more by this author.

Have a look at the brilliant trailer on YouTube here.

Tags: ,

2
Dec

Satin Cinnabar

   Posted by: Dorothea Preis    in Bookworm

Satin Cinnabar

Book Review:  Satin Cinnabar

Barbara Gaskell Denvil, Satin Cinnabar. ISBN 978-1-61842-424-2.  It is available online for all formats, Amazon Kindle, ipad Barnes & Noble etc.

I just finished this novel by our new branch member Barbara Gaskell Denvil and was absolutely delighted.

Satin Cinnabar starts with the protagonist, Alex, regaining consciousness at the end of the Battle of Bosworth, where he and his family and household fought for their King Richard against “the Tudor bastard”, and follow him through the first months of the reign of Henry Tudor.

With him we experience the upheaval the regime change brought to the upper classes, but the novel’s best feature is its description of the lives of ordinary people.  The lives of the servants in the great houses and the working class Londoners are so often missing in historical fiction, but not here.  Barbara’s description is excellent and through it the reader can feel and smell what life would have been like.  Her characterisation is equally strong and we emphasise with her characters.

Thrown in is a murder mystery (yes, the reader gets all the important clues) and a love story.  Love stories in historical fiction can sometimes be a bit cloying, but this one is refreshingly different.

It is a gripping and engrossing story, a real page turner, while maintaining a high level of historical accuracy.  I thought I was a bit over historical fiction, but then this novel came along and I can’t wait to read more by this writer.  A thoroughly enjoyable read, highly recommended!

Read here more about Barbara and the background behind this wonderful story.

Tags: , ,

22
Nov

Barbara Gaskell Denvil and Satin Cinnabar

   Posted by: Barbara Gaskell Denvil    in Bookworm

We asked our new branch member, Barbara Gaskell Denvil, about her personal background in writing Satin Cinnabar, wonderful novel set in Ricardian times.  Here is her answer:

I’ve always been attracted to English medieval history, being taken around castle ruins as a child, smelling that old damp mystery and the insistent intrigue of long forgotten secrets. So I read a considerable amount on the subject over the years but it wasn’t until a comparatively short ago when I wanted to start writing full length novels, that I became more consistently involved and studied in greater depth.

I come from a literary family (my sister is an author and my father was a playwright) and so started young myself, working for BOOKS AND BOOKMEN as a critic and publishing numerous short stories and articles. But after a tortuous marriage and producing three daughters, I needed escape. I explored the Mediterranean and its islands for many years but when my much loved partner died, I looked to escape again. Perhaps I am simply dedicated to escapism. Hence Australia (I am half Australian, half British) and the call of the novel.

Medieval England was the inspiration I needed and so once again I picked up my researches. Like so many Ricardians, I actually delved into the latter half of the 15th century after falling for the charismatically dastardly Richard of Shakespeare’s imagination. The wild exaggerations apart, I was quite prepared to believe in a ruthless king who did anything for power and deserved his ignominious end. Not that I was in favour of Henry Tudor’s usurpation I hasten to add, for my reading had already shown him to be a coldly calculating and devious creature who I did not warm to at all. But – shamefully – my researches up until then had not given a single clue as to Richard’s real character, and that Tudor propaganda continues to reign 500 years later is an absolute disgrace. Hail the Richard III Society.

Back to the point! I was looking for a delightfully evil king but I was soon disappointed. The man I discovered, even in those books which despised and insulted Richard, was a person of responsible authority, a man who lived according to high standards, a man who respected his wife (whether or not there was any genuine romance) and who – if indeed he usurped the crown – did so for very good reasons. Then I moved on to Paul Murrey Kendall, and the usurping, murdering hunchback of outrageous villainy was lost to me forever.

So I did not choose my opinion – the truth of Richard’s character was forced on me through my researches and now this much maligned king heads the very short list of my  historical ‘heroes’ and the only one who was possibly heroic in fact.

SATIN CINNABAR is a very small, very indirect tribute to the man I now so greatly admire, but my story is based more especially in the medieval London which fascinates me so much. I do not claim to be an historian or expert of any kind, but I know a good deal of what it was like to live then, and I have never read another book which attempts to bring that teeming, suffocating, wayward atmosphere to life. I have also long been haunted by the great battles of history, and the incredible toll they took not just on those who had to fight them, but on the relatives left behind, the ruined countryside, and the wandering shadows left to trouble men’s dreams. If ghosts do indeed exist, then what must have tramped across England’s battered pastures for so many long wretched years? We have recently come to understand something of the mental anguish now experienced by men who have witnessed appalling suffering in war. How much more did simple men feel 500 years ago when the cause they fought for was barely understood, and when they stood face to face with a neighbour, hacking desperately at his face as he hacked at yours? Surviving such butchery must have been the cause of thousands of lifetimes haunted by a hundred thousand nightmares. So that is where I began my book, during the aftermath of Bosworth, and the misery it spread then and afterwards.

But this book is no tragedy. Certainly many historians accept that the people of the past thought entirely differently to us, being influenced principally by the standards of the time, the habits of a backward society and of a domineering church. But as a good reading of more down to earth contemporary writing supports, I believe that human nature changes remarkably little. The people of the past had to accept the limitations forced on them, but they were not so different at heart. And that is how I have written this book. I just hope my readers find some enjoyment in my writing.

SATIN CINNABAR is published online for all formats, Amazon Kindle, ipad Barnes & Noble etc..

Please feel free to visit Barbara’s blog!

Tags: ,

14
Nov

Royal Manuscripts: The Genius of Illumination

   Posted by: Dorothea Preis    in News

The British Library is at present showing an exhibition of royal manuscripts which were collected over a period of more than 600 years, by kings from Athelstan (893/4–939) to Henry VIII (1491–1547).

The beautifully illuminated pages are glowing in their original colours.  The organisers tell us that it is likely that these manuscript were not only collected by the kings, but also handled and admired by them and their families. One of the earliest books is Athelstan’s copy of the Gospels and on one page there is a note describing the king’s release of a slave named Eadhelm after his coronation in 925.

The collection was started by Edward IV to display the greater glory of God and his chosen sovereigns and country, which of course were the Yorkist leaders rather than the Lancastrian ones.  Though we find these as well on the illuminated pages:  There is the book which was a wedding present from the 1st Earl of Shrewsbury to Margaret of Anjou, whom we can see on one page receiving the present.

Detail of the illumination showing Mragaret of Anjou (in the public domain, obtained through Wikimedia Commons)

Edward himself bought manuscripts of history books for £250, possibly for the education of his sons.

Another highlight is the route map for a 13th century pilgrim to Jerusalem by Matthew Paris, who lived approx. 1200–1259 and was a monk in St Albans.  Though not much is known about Matthew we know that his only international trip took him to Norway.  In spite of this his map shows us exactly how to get to Jerusalem, travelling through Kent, France and Italy and then by boat, including the must-see landmarks en route.

One reviewer criticises that the captions of the exhibits focus on the illustrations to the detriment of their historical context.  As an example she tells us that

The one that says flatly that Edward IV’s ‘two young sons…died in the Tower of London after his death’ is a woeful “princes in the Tower” rehash with no basis in historical certainty. (A later caption, more sensibly, adds the word “presumed”.) [Flanders]

We can only applaud her sentiments.

Unfortunately other reviewers are themselves not so sure of their history as the one who informs us that there are “prayer books belonging to queens such as Margaret Beaufort, Henry VI’s wife”! [Bates]

An impressive slideshow of some of the exhibits can be seen on the BBC website:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15667183.  For this link my thanks go to the facebook page of the Richard III Society.

The exhibition is shown until 13 March 2012.  For us down-under we can only suggest that the British Library needs to redecorate.  The perfect place for their beautiful books would be to display them in Australia.  This system seems to be working very well for other museums, think of the huge success of the Musee d’Orsay in Canberra, the Städel Museum Frankfurt in Melbourne or the Picasso exhibition here in Sydney right now.

Sources:

Stephen Bates, ‘Medieval monarchs’ books showcased by British Library’, The Guardian (10 November 2011).  URL:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/nov/10/medieval-monarchs-books-british-library Date accessed:  11 Nov 2011

Mark Brown, ‘British Library digs out decorative paintings to brighten up dark ages’, The Guardian (25 August 2011).  URL:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/aug/25/british-library-dark-ages-exhibition Date accessed:  11 Nov 2011

Judith Flanders, ‘Royal Manuscripts: The Genius of Illumination, British Library’, The Arts Desk (10 November 2011).  URL:  http://www.theartsdesk.com/visual-arts/royal-manuscripts-genius-illumination-british-library-0 Date accessed:  11 Nov 2011

Mary Mcconnell, ‘Might be worth a look, Wills: The medieval manuscripts that told England’s monarchs how to be a king’, Mail online (31 October 2011).  URL:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2055338/Medieval-manuscripts-told-Englands-monarchs-king.html Date accessed:  5 Nov 2011

Scot McKendrick, ‘Exhibition in focus: Royal Manuscripts, British Library’, The Telegraph (11 Nov 2011).  URL:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/europe/uk/london/8865233/Exhibition-in-focus-Royal-Manuscripts-British-Library.html Date accessed:  12 Nov 2011

Tags:

22
Oct

From my bookshelf – Treasures of the English Churches

   Posted by: Lynne Foley    in Bookworm

J. M. Robinson, Treasures of the English Churches.  Sinclair-Stevenson, 1995.   ISBN  9781856192866

This book is the culmination of a search of England to find interesting features of local churches, profusely illustrated in black and white and colour.  Not best pleased, however, to see on p. 131 a reference to  St Mary’s and All Saints, Fotheringhay, Northamptonshire:  Back of the pulpit with Tudor Royal Arms (and a colour picture).   Surely there are other treasures in this church that they could have chosen…

We do rather better with the Digger’s Club Garden Annual catalogue which lists on p. 28 – “King Richard:  The King of leeks.  An excellent early variety.  Produces extra long shanks with a creamy texture.”

I have adopted this vegetable for our King Richard.

Tags: ,

14
Oct

John Bell on Shakespeare

   Posted by: Julia Redlich    in News

For Australians surely there can be no better person that John Bell to listen to about William Shakespeare.  During his childhood in Maitland he was fortunate to have Shakespeare-loving teachers who took classes to see the Olivier Henry V, Hamlet and Richard III, as well as plays performed by visiting companies (not always brilliant).   One teacher told his parents that John’s destiny was inevitable:  to become an actor.

And at Sydney University he made his first appearance in 1959 as Coriolanus in a production by Ken Horler with whom, ten years later, he was to found the Nimrod Theatre.  In the interim he had spent five years with the Royal Shakespeare Company in the UK.

As he left to return to Australia he admits he wondered if he was doing the right thing.  Now he recognises it is the best decision he ever made.  He has acted and directed Shakespeare for all the major theatre companies in Australia, and in 1990 he founded the Bell Shakespeare Company without which our theatre world would be a lesser place.

He gave a lively and wonderfully informed talk about his book On Shakespeare* on 11 October 2011 at one of North Sydney Library’s author presentations held in conjunction with The Constant Reader bookshop.  Naturally there was a full house, standing room only eventually, but who noticed as we listened to descriptions of Stratford on Avon and seeing the places where Shakespeare was born and died; of learning of the challenge of performing at the new Globe theatre, a replica of the original, where the vertical audience tiers mean goodbye to a subtle aside and character introspection.  Full on projection to the highest level …

The talk was kept to a reasonable length in order to have time for questions – and the first of these (from someone I could barely see across the crowded room) was about Richard III. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , ,